Originally by: Torshin

---

Butter dog while counts reply to the one post in question was a perfectly acceptable one the others made by other ISS members were out of line, I quote a member of Lyrus associates, "Basically *****, an ISSO sanctioned mandatory op is any operation that Count says is ISSO sanctioned and mandatory.

If you're online. You show the hell up, and do what you're damn told. Sophistry and pedantry like yours weaken us.

We're being invaded. We can't afford to be weak. Being required to participate in operations to defend the alliance from external threats is the price you pay for being able to carebear in 0.0 the rest of the time.

Deal with it." (names of the OP have been removed)

Now while IAC does represent a clear and present danger like count says I didn't see ISSN and every southern corp rushing to the North when IRON and the rest of the North decided to set ISS to -10 and start camping Borealis. And while yes it is true that Iron did not attempt to take any POSs down or take the Outpost it self the same can be said for IAC they only camped ISS stations.
To reply to Raid, while advantage does usually go to the attacker, I do not believe that is the case when you are in a "defensive alliance" as Nyphur said.

Going back to Butter dog, just cause you whiped one corp into line doesn't mean that there aren't others who are becoming more and more jaded with every passing day. ISS isn't a pvp alliance and the players that are being forced to play POS warfare are not going to enjoy it when IAC has not made a move on ISS soverign space.

---

Originally by: Eris Discordia

---

We break after X amount of threads, then we go wild and then we get our medication.

---

Originally by: Eris Discordia

---

We break after X amount of threads, then we go wild and then we get our medication.

---

Originally by: Eris Discordia

---

We break after X amount of threads, then we go wild and then we get our medication.

---